Making the best use of electronic medical records has always
been a challenge and the federal government has been scrutinizing charting on
many levels. The points of interest to the auditors are:
- Cloning
a chart note to the next date of service
- Problem lists being used as the billing diagnosis codes, versus only billing codes that represent the evaluation and management of the condition(s) that were considered at the time of the treatment plan
- Incomplete
comments that may not be adequate for auditing purposes:
Stable Improving Deteriorating
No change since last seen Compliant
with treatment plan
Labs/radiology reviewed Above
/ or / As above
Instead comments that speak
to an auditor:
Improving since last visit May
15, 2014
No change since last seen June
3, 2013
Compliant with treatment plan
for lowering blood sugars
Deteriorating, consider hospice or refer to nutrition
counselor
Auxiliary services reviewed,
reports are negative for…
The ease of what you see in NextGen does not mean the
software is sufficient to stand scrutiny by an auditor either in house or
outside. There is an honorable gap between a trained clinician and a trained
auditor. Auditors respect your medical expertise, however we cannot assume or
re-analyze your intent. If we, as auditors, do not see a clear and concise
statement to support your choice of ICD code, we cannot support the billing for
that code and may delete it from the claim.
Utilize the following acronym MEAT for supportive
documentation, for compliant
records:
Monitor / Medicate Evaluate Assess
/Address Treatment
also Plan Referral
Written by: Leslie Fleeman, CPC. Used with permission.